Productivity. . . How far do we push?

A long time ago, before many executives reading this blog were born, I was in my first position after graduating from Engineering School. I was working in the aerospace industry on a military program. About three years into the project, things started heating up. We were “asked” (required really) to work six days a week to meet the contract obligations.

The company was very fair about this, paying time-and-a-half for the overtime hours even though we were salaried employees. And, in my opinion, they did not get anywhere near what they were paying for. After about three months of continuous overtime, I noticed that I and my colleagues were all putting off a bunch of stuff for “Saturday when it is quiet.” I don’t have hard data, but I’m pretty sure it’s accurate to say that it is likely that in the beginning, 48 hours of work was done in the 48 hours. But then it dropped to perhaps 40 hours of work done in 48 hours. I’m convinced that by the end of the twelve months of overtime, about 35 hours of work was being done in the 48 hours (even though we were being paid for 52 hours when you consider the time-and-a-half). This happened in a professional, white-collar workforce, not a unionized production line. While some of us enjoyed the extra pay, most of us would have rather had our weekends, so we did not intentionally slow down. We were simply burned out – not enough down time.

Today, in many companies, we are not asking or paying for overtime. However, we have asked those employees still with us to pick up the slack for those we’ve had to furlough, layoff, or force into early retirement. This has resulted in a steep increase in national productivity statistics. Many people seem to think that’s really great. I don’t.

While our employees may only be asked to work the standard 40 hours, they are either putting in extra time on their own to keep up with the load, or they are at the very least working quickly with little thought to quality or priorities. They just want to get the job done. The result, predictably, will be the same as it was in the ancient times when I was in aerospace. Burnout is bound to happen and productivity will take a dive – unless we, as forward thinking leaders, move to improve things.

There are many ways to make things a bit better. My favorite is to insist that people stop doing things – help them figure out what tasks they can safely let go without jeopardizing quality of products and services delivered to customers. Another might be to take this opportunity to move to a 4 day 40 hour work week. This is very attractive to many employees since it gives them a three day weekend. I know all the excuses for not doing this, but in general, they are simply excuses for not going through a change. We can make greater use of telecommuting so that folks can take small breaks between tasks. Another way is to begin hiring in part time folks to lessen the load (make sure you understand your state’s labor laws with respect to part time and independent consultants before moving forward with this). When things pick up, and the recovery is assured for you and your business, then you can increase the hours up to full employment.

It is best to address this challenge now rather than wait for your team to start burning out (if that hasn’t already begun). So what are your ideas? How can you make sure you avoid the difficult problem of rebuilding productivity after burnout?

You can download a free chapter on sourcing top talent from the best selling book, You’re NOT The Person I Hired, by CLICKING HERE.

About the author

Dave Kinnear is a sought after Business Advisor and Mentor.  He works with highly successful executives through one-to-one mentoring and coaching meetings. Individuals who are presently running successful businesses and executives in transition work with Dave to ensure meeting corporate and/or career goals. Through his affiliation with Vistage International, Dave convenes and facilitates Advisory Boards comprising Business Owners, Company Presidents and Chief Executives dedicated to becoming better leaders who make better decisions and achieve better results.

No related posts.

About the Author

Dave Kinnear is a sought after business advisor and mentor. He works with highly successful executives through one-to-one mentoring and coaching meetings. Individuals who are presently running successful businesses and executives in transition work with Dave to ensure meeting corporate and/or career goals. Through his affiliation with Vistage International, Dave convenes and facilitates Advisory Boards comprising Business Owners, Company Presidents and Chief Executives dedicated to becoming better leaders who make better decisions and achieve better results.

4 Comments to “Productivity. . . How far do we push?”

  1. By Bhavin Kamdar, November 25, 2009 @ 3:40 am

    Hi,
    Your article is good.
    What I personally feel that it purely depend upon an individual how to make most out of his or her working hours at office/ factory etc.
    Even if company make a law of working just 4 days and 10 hours a day – it is not sure that output from each one would be same.
    It is the belief in the company where you work, if you think it is your own company it would work better.
    Thanks
    Bhavin Kamdar

  2. By DaveKinnear, November 25, 2009 @ 12:05 pm

    Hi Mr. Kamdar,

    I agree with what your have said in your comment. Some time ago I had a discussion with a colleague who was concerned about the “young engineers” having no loyalty. My observation is that they indeed had a strong sense of loyalty. However, unlike my generation, that loyalty tended to be with a technology (say RISC architecture versus CISC architecture) rather than a company. They worked hard and put in extra effort as long as the present company allowed them to pursue their “real passion,” which was a technology or professional goal.

    Thanks for your comment!

    Dave

  3. By Ferd Dong, November 25, 2009 @ 12:41 pm

    Quite unusual (and refreshing) to find an article that warns about burn-out and false productivity statistics. I’ve seen these tactics crush companies in the past, as long ago as the mid-1980s. Today where I work, people are expected to take on the extra workloads left by laid off or forced-to-retire peers. They don’t get rewards (like extra pay), they don’t get future compensation time, but they do get told that they must do it under threat to their job security. Moral is very low and productivity and quality is suffering. I don’t know if managers don’t care, or if they don’t learn lessons from the past. I do think that this is a form of “Corporate Darwinism”, where the smart and adaptable survive while the rest barely remain profitable, if not perish.

  4. By DaveKinnear, November 26, 2009 @ 12:48 pm

    Hi Mr. Dong,

    Thank you for your kind comments. I wish I had a simple answer for your question regarding how managers evaluate productivity improvements versus the “burn out” situation. I think many of us have tried to make sure that bonuses reach deep into the organization to reward teams for improved profitability, revenues, customer service, etc. The difficulty is how to measure (it can be done) how work expands over time to fill the time allowed.

    Shaping the corporate culture to encourage and celebrate long term productivity improvements without exploiting our employees is, in my opinion, one of the critical strategic skills for executive leadership teams. Successfully executing on that strategic goal will be what differentiates great companies from the also-runs in the future. A worthy challenge for leadership.

    Dave K.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

CommentLuv badge

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

Powered by WishList Member - Membership Site Software