What Percentage of Your Hires Don’t Live Up to Expectations?

Over the last 15 years I’ve presented to well over 25,000 CEOs and senior executives. One of my favorite questions to ask is:

Of all the hires you’ve ever made, what percentage hit or exceeded your expectations? What percentage missed missed your targets?

Almost all these CEOs and Senior Executives claim that if they were hitting 50% they feel they would be doing a great job. Most readily admit they’re somewhere around 25%-33%.

Amazingly, this statistic is borne out through a lot of the research that has been done studying the accuracy of interviewing. Most studies, at best, show successful hiring less than 50% of the time.

Does this sound dysfunctional? Why do you except results in hiring that are basically random?

We call this CRAPSHOOT hiring since the success rate is essentially equal to rolling dice on the craps table in Las Vegas.

Rolling the Dice during CRAPSHOOT Hiring

You don’t accept this level of random results anywhere else in your business. Why then do you accept in when it comes to hiring? You would never accept random accuracy and results in the payroll checks you write or the invoices you send to customers. What rationalizations do you use to justify accepting random hiring results among your team?

There are many reasons that hiring fails in the vast majority of companies. However, the one that stands above all the rest is that the person or team conducting the interview lacks the skills and knowledge to do a decent job of interviewing.

In most companies, hiring and interviewing is not a process. It’s a set of arbitrary events predicated upon each individual executive or manager. Each one does it differently based on their life experiences.  This random, arbitrary, and poorly trained effort leads to random results.

Another one of the questions I pose in my workshops, seminars, and hiring manager training is:

When should you make a hiring a systematic and rigorous process – not unlike any other key process in your business?

The intuitive answer to that question is RIGHT NOW. Reality then sets in and you recognize that to move hiring from a random effort to a systematic, rigorous, and reliable process requires behavioral change among your executives and managers. Putting forms in place, sending managers to training, and giving out a list of questions to ask in the interview (this would actually exceed what most companies do) is not enough – you actually have to change the hiring behavior of executives and managers that when it comes to hiring adopt the philosophy of “you can’t teach old dogs new tricks.”

When will stop accepting poor hiring decisions in your organization – hiring people who either can’t deliver your expected outcomes or can’t fit in the culture of your business? When will you become so disgusted with your current approach to hiring that you’re finally ready to implement best practices to raise hiring accuracy? Discover some of the most common best practices in hiring and the most common mistakes by clicking here.

Barry Deutsch

How Much HIRING Training Do New Managers or Executives Get?

Ostrich (managers and executives) with their head buried in the sand

If you guessed ZERO, you’re probably not far off the mark. Why do most companies stick their head in the sand like the proverbial ostrich when it comes to hiring and interview training of managers and executives?

Very few companies give their new managers and executives any type of training in how to find, attract, evaluate, verify, vet, and validate the truth in interviews. As a result, the average level of hiring success hovers around the 50/50 mark. Not effectively training managers and executives in how to hire properly is the number one leading cause of hiring failure.

Just because someone has 22 years of experience and has hired 47 candidates in their career – does not mean they are effective at hiring. Experience doesn’t link to success. If we use a criteria of hiring success defined as candidates who achieve your expected outcomes over their first 12-18 months on the job, the actual level of hiring success is probably below 50 percent.

Is there any other process in your business where you will accept random results, results based on each individual managers life experiences, results where you allow bias and emotions to dictate outcomes, or results where no one follows any type of disciplined process?

How about the process of writing payroll checks or the process of paying vendor bills? You’d never accept a 50/50 level of success in those processes – so why do you accept it in hiring?

Okay – you might say “it doesn’t matter what we do – hiring can never be more accurate since people are involved in the process – a walking/talking product.” If that’s not a defeatist attitude, I’ve never heard one. Of course you can improve your accuracy in hiring – primarily by training your managers and executives. Numerous studies have shown, and we’ve validated it in thousands of Vistage/TEC companies, entrepreneurial companies, and large global businesses, that effective training of hiring managers and executives can dramatically improve hiring accuracy.

What are you waiting for? What’s your plan to improve your hiring accuracy? If you accept the trite phrase that people are our most important asset – are you willing to back it up with an investment of funds and time when it comes to training and developing managerial and leadership capability around hiring?

Barry Deutsch

PS – Take our quick one page hiring assessment to determine if your organization is capable of hiring top talent. Click here to download our popular hiring assessment matrix.