The Motivation Behind the Book – You’re NOT the Person I Hired
Brad and I (along with our former Partner – Janet Boydell), undertook the writing of our book “You’re NOT the Person I Hired” for a couple of reasons:
First, we enjoy making a difference in the lives of top talent and in the executives who hire top talent.
Secondly, we believe deeply and passionately that there is a better way to hire top talent than the traditional and tribal methods most executives and managers have used – those passed down through the generations.
We’ve spent 20 plus years working in the trenches of executive search before writing “You’re NOT the Person I Hired”. We devoured almost every hiring study conducted over the last 4-5 decades. We conducted our own original research. We kept journals on the hiring mistakes and successes of our clients.
Over those two decades (and the subsequent 5 years since publishing our book, we’ve seen a consistent pattern of why hiring fails and why it succeeds. We set out to capture the essence of the major hiring mistakes and simple steps that can be implemented to overcome them.
In our workshops to CEOs and presidents, key executives, and managers, we’ll frequently lead with an ice-breaker asking a question about hiring success. Over the last 25 years, Brad and I have probably conducted over 1,000 workshops and trained well over 35,000 executives and managers in how to hire more effectively.
So, as you can imagine, we’ve asked the following question a few times:
If you look back over your entire managerial career and the hires you’ve made – how many lived up to or exceeded your initial expectations and how many failed to meet your expectations?
To this day, I am still shocked by the response. The vast majority (85% and up) tell us that if they were batting 50% on hiring, they would be doing great. Most executives and managers, when conducting an honest evaluation of their hiring success, would peg themselves somewhere in the sub 30% range.
Does this sound dysfunctional?
Why do you accept it?
How can you rationalize a success rate of at best 50% in hiring? Might as well throw darts or roll dice. Your gambling success rate would probably match or exceed your hiring hit rate.
Is there any other process in your company where you’ll except what is essentially random variability? How about the accuracy of the payroll checks you write, or perhaps the invoices you send to customers?
NO – you wouldn’t accept in for any other process in your company – so then why do you accept it when it comes to hiring?
What’s the most common excuse for NOT being more effective at hiring? The most common answer we’ve heard in every workshop is “We don’t know any better”.
Brad and I are on a passionate mission to achieve a “tipping point” in hiring. We believe there is a better method – we’ve been working on a simple best practice approach that can be implemented in any size company or organization. We teach it in our workshops, blog about incessantly, and discuss it over and over on our Internet Radio Program.
By implementing a few basic best practices in hiring, you can easily raise your accuracy from the 50% range into the 80% plus range. Hundreds of companies – if not thousands worldwide have made a few small changes in their hiring process and have been blown away by the immediate improvement in hiring accuracy and reduction of hiring mistakes.
What’s the number one thing you plan on doing to improve your hiring process – starting this coming Monday?
Barry Deutsch
Related posts:
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI


